A region of empty space has no state of its own: an 8-site block of vacuum has nonzero entropy and is mixed (1 − Tr ρ² = 0.988) while the whole ring is pure, and its mutual information with the complement equals exactly twice its entropy — 100% of an empty region's entropy is correlation with the rest. Proving correlations never vanish at maximum separation required 120-digit arithmetic (3.68×10⁻⁵⁷).
The checkable content of 'the vacuum is one entangled object'. Correction recorded: in 1+1D the massless FIELD correlator is a logarithm, not a power law — the power law lives in the zero-mode-invariant gradient correlator (slope −1.999).
Falsify-box — how to kill this claim
Verification record — every quoted number, re-run 2026-07-26
| quantity | measured | verdict |
|---|---|---|
| I(A:Aᶜ) / S(A) | 2.0000 exactly | MATCH |
| mixedness of an empty 8-site block | 0.988 (whole ring is pure) | MATCH |
| correlator at maximum separation | 3.68e-57 at 120 digits — ~40 orders below the float64 floor | MATCH |
Provenance
script status: PRESENT
datasets: information-seam-scripts (downloadable from /data — run it yourself)
re-run: 2026-07-26
Status, honestly
verified by adversarial re-run (workflow, 2026-07-26) — PARTIAL on first pass: headline framing corrected (log vs power law) and float64 reach honestly bounded; admitted from MCP intake INTAKE-da3606e346. Status here is computed from evidence — the author cannot set it, and neither can we. Independent reproduction would move it; nothing else will.
The founder's own run of this script, captured verbatim. A match proves the result is reproducible; it is still R0 on this registry's independence rings — same code, so it cannot move a status. Only an outside run does that.
MENT does reveal A -- and still sends
nothing. Homodyne x on all 504 sites of B (ideal projective
measurement of the complement of A in a pure global state).
m=1e-06: cond(X_B) = 1.968e+06
S(A) unconditioned = 4.922063078 nats
S(A | outcome of x_B) = 0.000000000 nats
max|nu_cond - 1/2| = 1.311e-12 (1/2 = pure)
law of total covariance residual
max|Cov_cond + Cov_of_means - Cov_A| = 1.071e-08
same, divided by max|X_A| = 9.774e+02 -> 1.096e-11
m=5e-01: cond(X_B) = 4.123e+00
S(A) unconditioned = 0.270931445 nats
S(A | outcome of x_B) = 0.000000000 nats
max|nu_cond - 1/2| = 4.441e-16 (1/2 = pure)
law of total covariance residual
max|Cov_cond + Cov_of_means - Cov_A| = 5.551e-17
same, divided by max|X_A| = 4.370e-01 -> 1.270e-16
S(A|x_B)=0 is a theorem, not a fit: projectively measuring the
complement of A in a globally pure state must leave A pure. The
residuals above are float64 witnesses of the implementation, and
the homodyne is the idealised infinite-squeezing limit.
Reading ALL of B collapses A to a PURE state (S -> 0): the missing
information really was in the correlations, not lost. But the
ENSEMBLE over outcomes reconstructs sigma_A identically, so every
statistic available inside A alone is unchanged. Encoded: yes.
Readable from inside A: no. Signalling: none.
==============================================================================
HEADLINE NUMBERS
(every '+/-' anywhere above is an OLS fit standard error = fit quality
in a disclosed window. It is NOT an evidence sigma. Window drift,
printed next to each fit, is the honest systematic and is larger.)
==============================================================================
[H1] massless (m=1e-06) FIELD correlator does NOT decay:
X(255)/X(1) = 0.999176302 ; log-law coefficient of ln sin(pi r/N) =
-0.159126 vs CFT -1/(2pi) = -0.159155 (ratio 0.99982).
NEGATIVE RESULT: it is a LOGARITHM, not a power law -- 1+1D is the
special case. Slower than any power law, so 'never zero' holds.
[H2] massless POWER-LAW SLOPE of the zero-mode-invariant correlator
G(r) = <grad phi grad phi> = -Delta^2 X = P - m^2 X, fitted over the
disclosed window r in [4,32]: -1.999030 [continuum: -2 exactly]
slope movement across 5 windows = 0.121709 (finite-size ring images)
[H3] massive (m=0.5) EXPONENTIAL RATE, window r in [8,40], prefactor-
corrected: kappa_fit = 0.494312 vs LATTICE 2 asinh(m/2) = 0.494933
(uncorrected log-linear fit gives 0.517658 -- the 1/sqrt(r) prefactor)
correlation length 1/kappa_fit = 2.0230 sites vs 1/m = 2.0
[H4] FLOAT64 NOISE ONSET, massive X: relative error exceeds 100% at
r = 72. Last r with >=2 correct digits: r = 56. Every value
printed at r > 56 in float64 is ROUNDOFF, proven by (a) two
independent float64 routes diverging, (b) an mpmath reference,
(c) the value tracking the working precision until converged.
Converged extended-precision X(255) = 3.676757e-57 -- nonzero, and
~39 orders BELOW float64's ~1e-17 floor.
The massless correlator needs none of this: at r=255 it is 5.9924e-06,
~10^11 above the float64 floor, certified against mpmath to 1e-8.
[H5] S(L=8) for a block of EMPTY SPACE (no particles anywhere):
m=1e-06: 4.922063078 nats m=0.5: 0.270931445 nats -- both > 0
(the m=1e-6 value carries a non-universal ln(1/m) zero-mode piece;
the sign and the mixedness are what is load-bearing, not the size)
[H6] MIXEDNESS of that empty region, 1 - Tr rho_A^2:
m=1e-06: 0.988230179 m=0.5: 0.109659861
rho_A is MIXED: the region has no state of its own.
[H7] S(WHOLE RING) = 3.881e-08 (m=1e-06), 9.949e-12 (m=0.5).
Exact zero BY CONSTRUCTION (4XP=I); residual is a float64 witness
of correct implementation, NOT evidence strength.
Mutual information I(A:A^c) = 9.844126155 = 2.0000 x S(A) (m=1e-06):
100% of the region's entropy is correlation with everything else.
[H8] NO READOUT: random local symplectic on all of B changes sigma_A by
0.000e+00 (m=1e-06) / 0.000e+00 (m=0.5) -- exact zero, structurally.
Homodyning ALL of B drives S(A|x_B) to 0 (the information IS
there) while the outcome ensemble restores sigma_A exactly.
==============================================================================
INTERPRETATION (honesty rules apply)
==============================================================================
'Empty' is not 'independent'.
(a) Vacuum correlations between distant EMPTY regions never vanish.
Massless: the field correlator does not decay at all (it is a
logarithm) and its local, zero-mode-invariant part falls as a
power law r^-2.00, still 10^11 above the numerical floor at the
ring's maximum separation. Massive: exponential with a genuine
correlation length, and by r~70 the float64 answer is pure
roundoff -- yet extended precision shows the true value is ~1e-57,
not zero. BOTH HALVES MATTER: never exactly zero, and past a few
correlation lengths never remotely measurable either.
(b) Every region of the vacuum is a MIXED half of a PURE whole.
S(L=8) > 0 for a patch containing no particles, while S of the
entire ring is zero by construction. A part is mixed, the whole
is pure, and the whole of the part's entropy is mutual information
with the complement. The region therefore has no state of its own:
its 'missing' information is in correlations with everything else.
That is the precise, checkable content of 'the vacuum is one
entangled object'.
(d) None of this reads out or signals. Anything done inside B leaves
rho_A bit-identical; measuring the entire complement purifies A
conditionally but reconstructs rho_A on the ensemble. Information
being ENCODED in vacuum correlations is not the same as its being
ACCESSIBLE, and the numbers above separate the two cleanly.
WHAT THIS IS NOT. Nothing here is new. It is Reeh-Schlieder /
Summers-Werner / Srednicki / no-communication, recomputed on a 512-site
free scalar ring to check that this project's machinery reproduces them
and to find out where its arithmetic quits. Two honest failures are on
the record: the m=1e-6 zero mode costs ~12 of 16 digits on the absolute
correlator (only its r-dependence survives), and the massless field
correlator is NOT the power law the framing expected. No statement
above extends beyond a free scalar field on a lattice.
==============================================================================
This script needs data files, a heavy dependency, or more time than a browser tab should take. Download it from /data and run it locally.