USR-2026-0031 · Quantum

Accessible information under single-box information causality is 0.798 bits at S = 2√2 and 2.000 bits at S = 4, and van Dam's one-bit protocol succeeds at every n with a PR box while decaying to 0.498 by n = 16 with quantum correlations. But the 1-bit budget is crossed at S = 3.12, NOT at 2√2 — the quantum ceiling does not coincide with this bound.

PROVISIONAL 0.798 bits at 2√2; the 1-bit budget crosses at S = 3.12, not at 2√2 reproduced ≠ discovered re-run & confirmed 2026-07-09 (R0 — founder CI; independence pending)

CORRECTED 2026-07-26: the registered claim framed 2√2 as coinciding with the communication limit. This computation's own single-box edge lands 0.29 ABOVE 2√2. The tight information-causality result requires Pawłowski et al.'s nested protocol, which was not computed here — that framing is imported from the literature, not established by this work.

Falsify-box — how to kill this claim

SURVIVED Kill test for the RESTATED claim - a closed-form reproduction, not a test of nature. Rerun architecture_seam/run_tsirelson.py. DEAD if any of: (a) ic_info(2sqrt2) departs from 0.798 bits by more than 0.001; (b) ic_info(4) departs from 2.000 bits by more than 0.001; (c) van_dam_analytic(n, 4) != 1.000 for any n in 1..16; (d) the n = 16, S = 2sqrt2 Monte-Carlo success falls outside [0.478, 0.526], i.e. the closed form 0.502 plus/minus 3 sampling errors (3*sqrt(0.25/4000) = 0.024); (e) the root of ic_info(S) = 1 - the number the script itself prints at line 127 tagged 'single-box IC edge' - is not 3.12 plus/minus 0.01, since the restatement's positive assertion is that this edge lies 0.29 ABOVE Tsirelson rather than at it, and a wrong binary entropy, a wrong P = 1/2 + S/8 noisy-box mapping, or a wrong (S/4)^n exponent would move it; (f) PROVENANCE: DEAD if a nested/concatenated Pawlowski-type information-causality protocol, or any evaluation of Brassard's ~3.27 trivialization threshold, is found implemented anywhere in the repository, since the restatement asserts both are cited in prose only. The deleted 'coincides with the communication limit' framing needs no further test - it is already dead by the script's own printed 3.12.

Verification record — every quoted number, re-run 2026-07-09

quantitymeasuredverdict
accessible info at S = 2√2 0.798 bits MATCH
accessible info at S = 4 2.000 bits MATCH
where the 1-bit budget is crossed S = 3.12 — 0.29 ABOVE the quantum ceiling MATCH
van Dam protocol PR box succeeds 1.000 at every n; quantum decays to 0.498 by n = 16 MATCH
registered framing, superseded 'the quantum ceiling coincides with the communication limit' — not established here MATCH

Provenance

script: architecture_seam/run_tsirelson.py
script status: PRESENT
datasets: Information-causality simulation · claim-scripts (downloadable from /data — run it yourself)
re-run: 2026-07-09

Edges

REPRODUCES → Information-causality literature (Pawlowski et al.-type bound) — independently recomputed

Status, honestly

CORRECTED 2026-07-26 by the kill-test sweep; the audit flag it carried is resolved. Status here is computed from evidence — the author cannot set it, and neither can we. Independent reproduction would move it; nothing else will.

§ Figures 1 from architecture_seam/run_tsirelson.py

What this claim's own script draws. These are the founder's committed outputs — the same plots the script regenerates on any machine that runs it. You can redraw them yourself below.

tsirelson.png 161.7 KB download
§ Reproduction run_tsirelson.py

Two runs of the same script — mine, and one you can start right now. A match proves the result is reproducible; it is still R0 on this registry's independence rings — same code, so it cannot move a status. Only an outside run does that.

sha256 64393c43ec8e2b396cf3fc7c… size 10592 B exit 0 runtime 3.1s env python 3.12.2 · numpy 1.26.4 determinism byte-stable
A · Recorded founder's machine · 2026-08-02
WHY DOES REALITY STOP AT 2.83, NOT 4? — Tsirelson as a computational bound

  (1) THE LADDER of how non-local a universe could be:
      LOCAL (classical computer / hidden variables):  S <= 2.000
      QUANTUM = REALITY (Tsirelson):                  S <= 2.828
      NO-SIGNALING max (PR box, still no FTL signal):  S  = 4.000
      -> reality is non-local, but stops at 2.83 — strictly inside the 4
         that causality alone would allow. The gap 2.83->4 is the mystery.

  (2) van DAM: what a >quantum universe would give you — FREE computation.
      n-bit inner product with ONE bit of communication (needs n classically):
        n   local(S=2)  quantum(S=2.83)  PR box(S=4)
        1     0.753        0.850          1.000
        2     0.635        0.752          1.000
        4     0.509        0.627          1.000
        8     0.507        0.524          1.000
       16     0.502        0.498          1.000
      -> a PR box computes it PERFECTLY forever (free distributed compute);
         quantum decays to a coin-flip. Our universe does NOT hand out free
         computation — exactly because it stopped at 2.83.

  (3) INFORMATION CAUSALITY: can Bob learn more than Alice told him?
      S=2.00 (local           ): Bob's info = 0.377 bits  (Alice sent 1)
      S=2.83 (quantum/reality ): Bob's info = 0.798 bits  (Alice sent 1)
      S=3.12 (single-box IC edge): Bob's info = 1.000 bits  (Alice sent 1)
      S=4.00 (PR box          ): Bob's info = 2.000 bits  (Alice sent 1)
      -> above Tsirelson, Bob extracts MORE than one bit from one bit:
         information stops being conserved. The tight edge where this
         begins is exactly 2.83 (Pawlowski 2009, nested protocol).

  wrote tsirelson.png
  VERDICT — a computational signature, and it is measured:
    * Reality is non-local, but it halts at S=2.83, not the 4 that no-faster-than-
      light-signaling would permit. That specific stopping value is where TWO
      computational principles bite:
        - Information Causality: you cannot learn more than you are sent (exact at 2.83).
        - Non-trivial communication: distributed computation cannot be made free
          (van Dam: a PR box trivializes it; Brassard 2006: collapses for S>~3.27).
    * So 2.83 is the edge of causal 'sanity' for information and computation. If the
      universe is computed, THIS is what a resource budget looks like from inside —
      not a crude pixel grid (that seam was null), but a deep governor set exactly
      where correlations stay costly. The most on-thesis number in the whole hunt.
    * And crucially: this is LAB physics. No cosmic variance, infinite repeats, and
      already confirmed — quantum mechanics saturates 2.83 and no experiment has ever
      exceeded it. The one place the 'is it computed?' question gives a hard number.
    * Honest: Tsirelson(1980)/vanDam/Pawlowski/Brassard — celebrated results we
      reproduce, not a discovery. What is ours is the framing: the double slit ->
      Bell (non-local) -> Tsirelson (non-local with a computational governor).
B · Yours
Press Run it to execute this script in your own
browser — real CPython, numpy and matplotlib
compiled to WebAssembly. Nothing is sent to us;
it runs on your CPU. First run downloads the
runtime (~5 MB), then takes a few seconds.

The script runs unmodified: every number printed
here, and every figure it draws, is computed on
your machine. The figures appear below.
Figures your run produced
Sends only: script name and hash, the verdict, the line counts, how long it took, and your browser and OS family. No IP is stored (it is hashed), no fingerprint, nothing you typed. Your machine is hardware we don't own, so your run tests whether this result depends on the computer it was computed on — a question the registry cannot answer alone.
ledger 1 run · 1 reproduced · 0 unexpected · 1 platform (Chrome/macOS)
Share this claim X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN Email