USR-2026-0014 · CMB
The large-angle missing power survives all four map cleanings (D₂ = 243/200/184/198 µK²; S_1/2 anomalous at >3σ in every cleaning), while the alignment axis is fragile (3-30° spread).
PROVISIONAL
>3σ missing power; axis fragile
re-run & confirmed 2026-07-09 (R0 — founder CI; independence pending)
Robustness battery across four independent foreground cleanings: the missing power is a stable feature of the sky; the preferred-axis direction is not, and is flagged accordingly.
Falsify-box — how to kill this claim
UNTESTED
The load-bearing content is cleaning-independence (the summary's 'stable feature of the sky'), so the test must probe additional cleanings and the significance floor. (a) EXTENSION: run the identical battery from run_boundary_angles.py on public cleanings it omits - Planck SEVEM, the fourth PR3 component-separation method (the battery uses only SMICA, COMMANDER, NILC), and the PR4/NPIPE maps. The claim is DEAD if any of them gives p(D_2) > 0.317 (D_2 > 650 uK^2 in the script's own plateau null, i.e. within 1 sigma of LambdaCDM) or cut-sky S_1/2 with p > 0.00135, because 'survives all map cleanings' and 'anomalous at >3 sigma in every cleaning' would then be false of the available cleanings. Note also that three of the four current cleanings share one instrument AND one mask (planck_mask.fits, MAPS table lines 46-49), so the battery tests 2 independent datasets, not 4. (b) MC FLOOR: the '>3 sigma in every cleaning' figure comes from cut_null(n=2500) with p clipped at max(p, 1/2500) = 0.0004 -> 3.35 sigma (line 153), so '>3 sigma' IS the Monte-Carlo floor. Re-run with N >= 10^5 and the simulations put through the same beam plus nside-16 pixel window as the data; DEAD if any cleaning's cut-sky p >= 0.00135.
Verification record — every quoted number, re-run 2026-07-09
| quantity | measured | verdict |
|---|---|---|
| missing power across 4 cleanings | D₂ = 243/200/184/198 µK²; S_1/2 > 3σ in all | MATCH |
| axis stability | fragile — spread 3-30° | MATCH |
Provenance
script: boundary_seam/run_boundary_angles.py
script status: PRESENT
datasets: WMAP 9-yr ILC · Planck cleaned maps (4 cleanings total) · claim-scripts (downloadable from /data — run it yourself)
re-run: 2026-07-09
script status: PRESENT
datasets: WMAP 9-yr ILC · Planck cleaned maps (4 cleanings total) · claim-scripts (downloadable from /data — run it yourself)
re-run: 2026-07-09
Status, honestly
R0 pass 2026-07-09 | kill test added by the 2026-07-26 sweep. Status here is computed from evidence — the author cannot set it, and neither can we. Independent reproduction would move it; nothing else will.
§ Figures
2 from boundary_seam/run_boundary_angles.py
What this claim's own script draws. These are the founder's committed outputs — the same plots the script regenerates on any machine that runs it.
